Cutting Co-Pays Helps Heart Patients Take Their Meds
Cutting Co-Pays Helps Heart Patients Take Their Meds

Cutting Co-Pays Helps Heart Patients Take Their Meds

Cardiovascular Diseases

HealthDay News


WEDNESDAY, March 14, 2018 (HealthDay News)—People who've had a heart attack are more likely to be prescribed and take recommended blood-thinning drugs if they get vouchers to waive their co-payments, a new study shows.

The finding comes from a study of 11,000 people treated for heart attack at 300 U.S. hospitals. All of the patients had health insurance: 64 percent had private insurance, 42 percent were covered by Medicare and 9 percent had Medicaid.

About 17 percent said they'd previously not filled a prescription because of the cost.

For the study, people at some hospitals were given vouchers to cover their co-payments for a year for their medication to prevent another heart attack. Study participants at other hospitals did not get the vouchers. The study looked at medications such as clopidogrel (Plavix) or ticagrelor (Brilinta).

When the patient had a voucher, doctors were more likely to prescribe a brand-name drug, rather than a generic drug, the study found. Also, people who were given vouchers were 16 percent more likely to continue taking their medication for a full year, as recommended.

The combined rate of heart attack, stroke or death from any cause was essentially the same whether people did or did not get vouchers, the findings showed.

The study—funded by drug maker AstraZeneca—was presented this weekend at an American College of Cardiology (ACC) meeting, March 10-12, in Orlando, Fla. Research presented at meetings is considered preliminary because it has not undergone the extensive scrutiny given to research published in medical journals.

The researchers also noted that they were surprised to find that 28 percent of the patients who were given vouchers did not use them. Those patients were the least likely to take prescribed medications and most likely to have poor outcomes, the study authors said.

Though the study found that eliminating co-payments improved the prescription and use of the medications, it raises "further questions," study author Dr. Tracy Wang said in an ACC news release. She's an associate professor of medicine at the Duke University Medical School.

Wang said these questions focus on "how best to deploy co-payment reduction to effectively improve clinical outcomes, as well as how to consider co-payment reduction strategies alongside other measures to improve patient adherence."

SOURCE: American College of Cardiology, news release, March 11, 2018

Copyright © 2018 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

ADVERTISEMENT

How Many Lives Have Coronavirus Vaccines Saved? We Used State Data on Deaths and Vaccination Rates to Find Out

Clinical trials demonstrate how effective vaccines are individually, but the real world shows how effective they are at a population level.

Your Health

WHO Approved a Malaria Vaccine for Children – a Global Health Expert Explains Why That Is a Big Deal

Malaria, a parasitic disease transmitted by bites from infected mosquitoes, causes nearly half a million deaths per year, mostly in children in sub-Saharan Africa

Your Health

‘Truth and Healing Commission’ Could Help Native American Communities Traumatized by Government-Run Boarding Schools That Tried to Destroy Indian Culture

The schools represent a particularly insidious method of attempting forced assimilation because they involved the removal of children, sometimes by kidnapping, from their families and communities

Your Care

by eMediHealth

☆☆☆☆☆ By eMediHealth ☆☆☆☆☆