Search powered by AI
Healthy Women Image

HealthyWomen Editors

The editorial team and staff of HealthyWomen.

Kim Ledgerwood

Editorial Director, HealthyWomen

As HealthyWomen’s editorial director, Kim oversees the production of all content and ensures that it is aligned with our mission, meets our high editorial standards and captures our brand voice.

Kim is an award-winning editor and copywriter with more than 25 years of experience. She started her career as a copywriter and broadcast producer at the Southeast’s largest full-service advertising agency, The Tombras Group. Since then, she has edited and written for a wide variety of clients, ranging from Fortune 500 companies to indie authors across multiple industries and topics.

She holds a bachelor’s degree in communications from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, as well as a master’s degree in communications/advertising from The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

Kim lives in Maryland with her husband, three children and a menagerie of pets.

Jacquelyne Froeber

Senior Editor, HealthyWomen

Jacquelyne Froeber is an award-winning journalist and editor. She holds a BA in journalism from Michigan State University. She is the former editor-in-chief of Celebrated Living magazine and has editing and writing experience for print and online publications, including Health magazine, Coastal Living magazine and AARP.org.

As a breast cancer survivor, Jacquelyne encourages everyone to perform self-exams and get their yearly mammograms.

Full Bio

HealthyWomen Urges Congressional Leaders to Protect Beneficiaries of Medicare Part D

HealthyWomen in the News

As the nation's leading independent, nonprofit health information source for women, HealthyWomen is concerned about proposals and activities that can undermine the quality and value of health care for women. Therefore, we are concerned about the provision in the Senate budget bill that would undermine the structure and insurance benefit of the Medicare Part D program. Specifically, by restructuring the benefit so that Medicare Part D plans have no financial exposure in the coverage gap (a.k.a. donut hole), Part D plans would no longer have incentives to act as partners with Medicare beneficiaries – and fiduciary representatives – to ensure that patients are getting the most clinically and cost effective medicines at the best prices.


In health insurance discussions, the term "skin in the game" is often used to describe the situation where stakeholders have some financial interest in managing health care to provide the best value and outcomes for patients. Taking away the Part D plans' "skin in the game" in the coverage gap undermines this concept and the important role Part D plans serve as effective negotiators on behalf of Medicare beneficiaries.

"Part D helps nearly 42 million Americans afford prescription drugs by fostering private negotiations that reduce drug costs. If passed, the new provision – that has not been discussed in hearings or recommended by MedPAC – would undermine the negotiation process and hurt older adults and the disabled who rely on Medicare Part D. Thus, we urge Congress to discard this provision, and continue to maintain a patient-centered approach for Medicare's coverage and benefits in Part D and in the entire Medicare program," says Beth Battaglino, RN, CEO, HealthyWomen.

You might be interested in
Trending Topics