womenTALK: Blog

Wednesday, Dec 14th 2011

The Latest Breast Cancer News

authored by Sheryl Kraft

More than 230,000 new cases of breast cancer are expected to be diagnosed in our country in 2011. Though death rates are declining by 31 percent, incidence rates are not keeping pace, only declining by about 5 percent. And since less than 10 percent of the cases are genetic, clearly more needs to be learned about ways to prevent the disease.

Because I'm both a breast cancer survivor (just passed year 23!) and a health writer, many people come to me with questions or advice about breast cancer. And it's sometimes hard, really, to know what to say since despite my close relation to the disease, I'm NOT a doctor. Yet it's that combination of curiosity and professional obligation that keeps me busy keeping up with the latest (or trying to, anyway). I don't expect everyone to follow the news on this disease like I do; but being that we're all women (OK, I know some men are reading so here's my chance to say thanks for that!), I'm certain that you might be curious, too.

Though October and breast cancer awareness month have long gone, last week felt like it was October once again. The topic was all over the news after a report by a respected panel of science advisors, paid for by the Susan G. Komen breast cancer foundation, was presented at a major cancer conference in Texas. In case you missed the latest, here's a round-up of what's been out there.

Some of it is not new and might not surprise you (like smoking being a probable cause); some of it might anger you, especially if you are an environmentalist and believe in chemical policy reform (like BPA evidence being "biologically plausible" but not conclusive); some of it might scare you (like two to three abdominal CT scans being the equivalent of the radiation atomic bomb survivors received).

Ways to lower our risk of breast cancer:

  • Avoid unnecessary or too much medical radiation (especially during childhood).
  • Don't take combination estrogen-progestin hormone therapy for menopause.
  • Limit alcohol use.
  • Don't smoke; if you do, then quit (it's possible, too, that secondhand smoke presents a risk).
  • Avoid excess weight after menopause (fat tissue is the body's main source of estrogen after menopause).

Other "possible" causes for increased risk include benzene and a few other chemicals in the workplace, breathing car fumes or pumping gas. The jury might still be out, but many groups firmly believe that there is a definitive connection. To me, that signals the wisdom in erring on the side of caution.

According to the panel of independent experts who advise the government, these are things we can worry less about:

  • Hair dye
  • Radiation from cell phones, microwaves and electronic gadgets

And then, there are things we should do more of, like increase physical activity.

You might be thinking, "I already know all this. It's nothing new!" I'm sorry. I wish there was more I could tell you that you probably don't already know. But at least The Institute of Medicine is recommending improving the tools for epidemiologic research and for testing of chemicals and other substances, as well as developing effective preventive interventions and improving communication about the risks.

Other news:

For the 45,000 women who are diagnosed with DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ), the earliest form of breast cancer, a new genetic test might be effective in identifying those who are least likely to suffer a recurrence. It's unclear whether or not this type of cancer (or pre-cancer, as many people think it should be called) should even be treated; so far, many commonly opt for lumpectomy and/or radiation.

Increased consumption of foods rich in carbohydrates, especially starches, may boost the risk of breast cancer recurrence. Though researchers did not target the exact foods, refined carbs like white breads and white pasta, contain more starch than whole grains.

Women who receive at least three screening mammograms have a 49 percent lower risk of dying from the disease, says a new Dutch study.

You might also want to read:
Breast Cancer: 10 Common Misconceptions
Breast Cancer

Comments

Dec 21, 2011 20:Dec 8 | Jodypag said

I also found

I also found www.breastcanceranswers.com to be helpful for questions and concerns, they also have a downloadable PDF to take to your doctor. It's crazy all the information out there on Breast Cancer and great to have websites like this out there to get the word out on Breast Cancer. On my daughters biological fathers family alone, she has 2 great aunts who are battling it and 1 great grandmother who passed away from breast cancer.

Jan 18, 2012 14:Jan 2 | Sheryl said

Thanks for posting the

Thanks for posting the information, Jody.

Dec 19, 2011 13:Dec 1 | Jane Boursaw said

Good to know that hair dye is

Good to know that hair dye is less of a risk. I do need to work on the excess weight after menopause thing, though. Thanks for all the great info.

Dec 16, 2011 19:Dec 7 | Living Large said

This is great information,

This is great information, thanks for the latest update.

Dec 15, 2011 19:Dec 7 | Irene said

Thanks for allaying concern about the hair color :-)

I can limit smoke and alcohol but haircolor?
Best,
Irene

Dec 19, 2011 20:Dec 8 | Sheryl said

I'm with you on the

I'm with you on the haircolor...tough to do without!

Dec 15, 2011 17:Dec 5 | Kris @ Attainable Sustainable said

First, to respond to Roxanne,

First, to respond to Roxanne, I believe it's the maitake mushroom that's beneficial.

Thanks for this. I'm happy to see that prevention is something that people are talking about. We have so much environmental chemical exposure that we really just can't escape (pesticides and insecticides in public places, for example); it's good to know that we can make a few changes at home that might make a difference. Sometimes it feels like a hopeless cause, though. All the work we do to stay healthy, but we still have to deal with outside exposures. Sigh.

Dec 19, 2011 20:Dec 8 | Sheryl said

Well, we do the best we can,

Well, we do the best we can, I guess; but I agree, it is sad that we, ourselves, can do everything right but can't control what others around us do that might be harming us.

Dec 15, 2011 15:Dec 3 | Sheryl said

Yes, No Pot, those mixed

Yes, No Pot, those mixed recommendations keep on happening, with no end in sight. I think women have to do what is best for them, based on their personal history and circumstances.

Dec 15, 2011 13:Dec 1 | Melanie said

With NoPotCooking on the

With NoPotCooking on the confusion on best time to GET a mammogram. I've had X-rays, CAT scans and MRIs for various things over the years and am NOT keen on extra radiation.

Dec 15, 2011 10:Dec 10 | Alisa Bowman said

I wish someone would blow up,

I wish someone would blow up, frame and send your line about "avoid unnecessary medical radiation" to dentists and chiropractors. They are always pushing the x rays!

Dec 17, 2011 20:Dec 8 | Casey said

Yes! I feel like a broken

Yes! I feel like a broken record asking if the dental x-rays are really necessary every darn time.

Dec 15, 2011 08:Dec 8 | Sandra said

Love this research round up.

Love this research round up. Thank you!

Dec 14, 2011 18:Dec 6 | Alexandra said

Hmmm. Glad I refused a CAT

Hmmm. Glad I refused a CAT scan yesterday. I tend to err on the side of caution, too, and am convinced estrogen-mimics are more dangerous that the IOM report seems to say. When in doubt, eat organic and get exercise, right? Still, I'm scratching my head. I don't like that much of the media coverage of the report has been dismissive of the role of synthetic chemicals as I believe they do play a role in the increased rates of cancer in modern society, way up from 40 years ago. Check out this editorial on the subject, which was published last week in Environmental Health News: http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org/ehs/news/2011/news-stories-miss-i....

Dec 19, 2011 20:Dec 8 | Sheryl said

Glad you refused it, too.

Glad you refused it, too. It's just way to much radiation. I realize that sometimes CAT scans are absolutely necessary, but lots of people don't realize that they CAN say "no." And thanks for pointing out the link from Environmental Health News, Alexandra.

Dec 14, 2011 16:Dec 4 | Kristen said

I'm with NoPotCooking, it

I'm with NoPotCooking, it seems like early testing is a no-brainer and yet there seems to be some confusion on that. I was surprised that I'm paying a bill to my doctor my insurance refused for a regular test because it wasn't considered 'preventative.'So much information about women's heath to sift through--thanks for breaking it down!

Dec 14, 2011 16:Dec 4 | Merr said

I recently read about this in

I recently read about this in the Los Angeles Times. Very interesting, but I wonder if there will be more research done!

Dec 14, 2011 11:Dec 11 | Roxanne said

I saw something on TV the

I saw something on TV the other day about how eating more plain white mushrooms is helpful. Have you seen that study?

Dec 15, 2011 15:Dec 3 | Sheryl said

I haven't seen that study, at

I haven't seen that study, at least not recently. There have been studies showing a possible relationship to a reduced risk of breast cancer, but those were done a few years back. Maybe this is old news that was reported on; or I wonder if there is something new? Time to check it out...

Dec 14, 2011 11:Dec 11 | NoPotCooking said

That's great news about the

That's great news about the mammograms reducing risk of death. Very encouraging. And yet there are mixed recommendations about when people should get them.

Post new comment

If you do not wish to leave your name, please leave the "name" field blank.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.